Side by side, in your stack's language.
We get asked the same four comparisons in nearly every call. Each page below answers the real question the buyer brings — not "which is better", but "where does CYBRET fit alongside what we already run?"
Snyk
Snyk surfaces every CVE with a known signature. CYBRET reasons about which CVEs are actually reachable in your live identity + data graph, validates them autonomously, and produces a proof-of-exploit capsule with rollback. Different problem.
Wiz
Wiz is best-in-class for cloud posture. CYBRET extends the graph through application logic, identity, and runtime call traces — and runs the exploit safely to prove the path. Wiz answers "what is misconfigured?" CYBRET answers "what can actually be exploited?".
Semgrep
Semgrep ships excellent SAST rules for code-pattern detection. CYBRET reasons about business logic, identity flow, and runtime — finding the exposures rules cannot encode. Use both for full coverage; pick CYBRET when the rules pack has nothing to say.
Prisma Cloud
Prisma Cloud is a mature, broad CNAPP. CYBRET runs alongside it for application-layer reasoning, reachability, and autonomous validation. For federal workloads that require FedRAMP today, Prisma Cloud is the right answer; for application-layer reachability, CYBRET is.
CYBRET layers on top of an existing CVE feed, CSPM, or SAST tool. The reasoning engine adds the part the rules engine can't: which exposures are reachable in your live graph, and what an autonomous adversary would do with them.
Most teams keep their existing scanners. Where CYBRET tends to absorb scope: ad-hoc red-team workstreams, manual reachability triage, and the "is this exploitable in our environment?" loop after a CVE drops.
Is the comparison fair? Where the competitor has a real strength we don't (e.g. Prisma Cloud's FedRAMP, Snyk's developer plugin polish), we say so on the page.